EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

For a non-registered annuity purchase by an individual seeking tax efficiency, the recommendation should:

  • ASet tax aside, since the difference between prescribed and accrual treatment is too small to affect the choice
  • Structure the annuity to qualify for prescribed treatment where suitable, levelling the taxable portion
  • CChoose accrual taxation, since paying more tax early reduces the client's exposure to future rate increases
  • DHave a corporation own the annuity, since corporate ownership gives the most favourable tax treatment

Correct answer: B) Structure the annuity to qualify for prescribed treatment where suitable, levelling the taxable portion

Prescribed status is a design outcome. It suits clients who want level income and lower early tax.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ATax treatment is a key input to designing a non-registered annuity.
  • CAccrual front-loads tax.
  • DCorporate ownership disqualifies prescribed treatment.

Exam tip

Non-registered annuity: design for prescribed status when suitable.

Common mistake

Accidentally disqualifying prescribed status with indexing or deferred start.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.