EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

For a client whose group RRSP offers only high-fee funds, the recommendation may be:

  • Contribute enough to capture the full employer match, and direct additional savings to lower-cost vehicles
  • BComplain to the insurer about the fund line-up, since the provider is obliged to offer low-cost options on request
  • CSkip the group plan entirely, since the fee difference will outweigh any benefit over a working lifetime
  • DContribute only to the group plan, since payroll deduction and employer matching make it the best home for all savings

Correct answer: A) Contribute enough to capture the full employer match, and direct additional savings to lower-cost vehicles

Employer matching is an immediate return no fee difference can offset. Beyond the match, cost matters.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BA complaint is not a recommendation for the client.
  • CSkipping the group plan forfeits the employer's matching contribution.
  • DHigher fees apply to unmatched money that could go elsewhere.

Exam tip

Capture the match; optimize cost beyond it.

Common mistake

Advising a client to leave employer matching on the table.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.