EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 2.1 · 30% of the exam

Active versus passive management in segregated funds: the trade-off is:

  • Active funds seek to outperform at higher cost and may lag; passive funds deliver index returns cheaply
  • BNone, since both approaches produce the same return once fees are taken into account
  • CPassive funds are always better, since no active manager can beat the index over any period
  • DActive funds are guaranteed to win, since professional managers can avoid the worst securities and buy the best ones early

Correct answer: A) Active funds seek to outperform at higher cost and may lag; passive funds deliver index returns cheaply

Both approaches exist within seg fund line-ups. Cost and consistency favour passive for many clients; active may add value in less efficient markets.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BThe trade-off in cost and dispersion of outcomes is real.
  • CNeither is universally superior.
  • DActive management has no guarantee of outperformance.

Exam tip

Active: potential outperformance, higher cost, selection risk. Passive: index return, low cost.

Common mistake

Promising an active fund will beat its index.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 2.1 — Analyze the available products that meet the client's needs — which is weighted at 30% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 2

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.