EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

A recommendation to reset the guarantee should consider:

  • Whether locking in the higher value is worth extending maturity, the need date, and the reset rules
  • BOnly the current market level, since a reset is always worthwhile when the fund is above its previous high
  • CThe agent's commission on the reset, since a reset is a transaction on which the agent is compensated
  • DNothing in particular, since resets are automatic and the client has no decision to make about them

Correct answer: A) Whether locking in the higher value is worth extending maturity, the need date, and the reset rules

Resets are valuable but extend the term. A client two years from needing the money may not want a reset that pushes maturity out ten years.

Why the other options are wrong

  • BThe maturity extension matters as much as the market level.
  • CThe agent's commission has no bearing on whether a reset suits the client.
  • DThe trade-off matters and the client decides.

Exam tip

Reset: higher guarantee vs later maturity; check the need date.

Common mistake

Resetting near the need date.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.