EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

A healthy client with several relatives who lived past ninety-five is choosing a retirement income structure. This history strengthens the case for:

  • Aholding everything in cash so the capital remains intact for as long as she lives
  • a life annuity or another guaranteed lifetime income, because outliving savings is the real risk
  • Ca term-certain annuity ending at eighty-five, which gives the largest possible payment now
  • Ddrawing down savings on a plan that assumes she dies at average life expectancy

Correct answer: B) a life annuity or another guaranteed lifetime income, because outliving savings is the real risk

Family longevity and good health raise the chance of a very long retirement. A lifetime income shifts that risk to the insurer, which is exactly what a client likely to live well beyond average needs.

Why the other options are wrong

  • ACash preserves the amount but not its purchasing power over decades.
  • CAn income that stops at eighty-five is dangerous for someone likely to live longer.
  • DPlanning to the average leaves roughly half of such clients short of money.

Exam tip

Longevity in the family shifts the answer toward guaranteed lifetime income.

Common mistake

Planning a drawdown to average life expectancy for a client likely to exceed it.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.