EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

A client will retire with government benefits and modest savings and may qualify for an income-tested supplement. The agent should consider that:

  • Aall savings are ignored when the supplement is calculated, so the structure does not matter
  • Bthe supplement is paid only to clients who hold no registered savings of any kind at all
  • registered withdrawals count as income and could reduce the supplement she receives
  • Dan annuity purchase permanently disqualifies a client from every federal income programme

Correct answer: C) registered withdrawals count as income and could reduce the supplement she receives

Withdrawals from registered plans and annuity income count toward the income test, so each dollar drawn can reduce the supplement. A tax-free account may serve such a client better, and the effect should be flagged for professional advice.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AThe supplement is tested on income, and registered withdrawals form part of it.
  • BHolding registered savings does not disqualify anyone from the supplement.
  • DAnnuity income is counted like other income; it does not disqualify the client outright.

Exam tip

Low income plus a tested supplement equals check the effect of registered withdrawals.

Common mistake

Recommending registered savings to a client whose benefits are reduced by the withdrawals.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.