EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.2 · 25% of the exam

A client proposes to fund a deposit with a cheque drawn on a company account belonging to her employer. At implementation the agent must:

  • Arefuse all cheques that are not personal, since only personal accounts may be used
  • Bdeposit it and note in the file that the client explained the source of the money verbally
  • Caccept it, since the insurer only needs the funds to clear before units are allocated
  • establish whose money it is and complete a third party determination before proceeding

Correct answer: D) establish whose money it is and complete a third party determination before proceeding

Anti-money-laundering rules require the agent to determine whether a third party is instructing or funding the transaction. A company cheque calls for an explanation, documentation of the relationship and a completed determination.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AA company cheque may be acceptable once the relationship has been established.
  • BA verbal note does not satisfy the documented determination that is required.
  • CClearance of funds says nothing about whose money is being invested.

Exam tip

Funds from an account in another name always trigger a third party determination.

Common mistake

Treating source of funds as a formality when the payment comes from elsewhere.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.2 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.