EstatePass

LLQP Segregated Funds & Annuities · Component 3.1 · 25% of the exam

A client asks whether a segregated fund's guarantee is worth it if she plans to withdraw gradually over 20 years. The honest analysis is:

  • AYes, since the guarantee protects every withdrawal against a decline in the fund's value
  • Interim withdrawals are at market value and reduce the guarantee, so a GMWB or annuity fits better
  • CShe should never withdraw from the contract, since any withdrawal permanently damages the guarantee
  • DGuarantees are irrelevant to her, since a client who plans to withdraw has no use for any insurance feature at all

Correct answer: B) Interim withdrawals are at market value and reduce the guarantee, so a GMWB or annuity fits better

Matching the guarantee type to the withdrawal pattern is a subtle but essential recommendation point.

Why the other options are wrong

  • AWithdrawals are unprotected by the maturity guarantee.
  • CWithdrawals are her plan; the product should fit it.
  • DThe right guarantee type matters.

Exam tip

Gradual withdrawals → GMWB/annuity, not maturity guarantee.

Common mistake

Selling a maturity guarantee to a systematic withdrawer.

What this tests

CISRO competency component 3.1 — Implement a recommendation adapted to the client's needs and situation — which is weighted at 25% of the Segregated Funds & Annuities module. Written against the published curriculum.

More from component 3

Practice the whole Segregated Funds & Annuities module

Timed sets weighted like the exam, and review of every question you miss. Free to start.