EstatePass
Property LawProperty RightsMEDIUM

What is the main difference between a restrictive covenant and a positive covenant affecting land?

Correct Answer

B) Restrictive covenants prohibit certain actions while positive covenants require specific actions to be taken

Restrictive covenants prohibit landowners from doing certain things (such as building above a certain height), while positive covenants require landowners to actively do something (such as maintain a fence or contribute to shared costs). Both types can be registered on title and bind future owners.

Answer Options
A
Restrictive covenants expire after 20 years while positive covenants are permanent
B
Restrictive covenants prohibit certain actions while positive covenants require specific actions to be taken
C
Restrictive covenants only apply to residential land while positive covenants apply to commercial land
D
Restrictive covenants are registered on title while positive covenants are only contractual

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B correctly identifies the fundamental distinction between covenant types. Restrictive covenants impose negative obligations, prohibiting specific actions like building above height limits, operating certain businesses, or subdividing land. Positive covenants impose affirmative obligations requiring landowners to actively perform duties such as maintaining common areas, contributing to shared expenses, or preserving heritage features. This distinction is recognised in Australian property law and affects how covenants are drafted, registered, and enforced under the Torrens system.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Restrictive covenants expire after 20 years while positive covenants are permanent

This is incorrect regarding timeframes. Neither restrictive nor positive covenants automatically expire after 20 years in Australia. Covenants may have specified expiry dates or sunset clauses, but there's no universal 20-year rule. Some covenants are perpetual unless modified or extinguished through specific legal processes.

Option C: Restrictive covenants only apply to residential land while positive covenants apply to commercial land

This incorrectly suggests covenants are limited by land use type. Both restrictive and positive covenants can apply to residential, commercial, or industrial land. The type of covenant depends on its purpose and terms, not the zoning or use classification of the affected land.

Option D: Restrictive covenants are registered on title while positive covenants are only contractual

This is factually incorrect. Both restrictive and positive covenants can be registered on title under the Torrens system and bind future owners. While positive covenants may face enforceability challenges, they can still be validly registered as encumbrances affecting the land.

Deep Analysis of This Property Law Question

This question tests understanding of fundamental covenant types in Australian property law under the Torrens system. Covenants are legal obligations that run with the land, binding current and future owners. The distinction between restrictive and positive covenants is crucial for property professionals as it affects enforceability, registration requirements, and practical compliance. Restrictive covenants create negative obligations (prohibitions) and are generally easier to enforce against successors in title. Positive covenants create affirmative duties requiring ongoing action or expenditure, making them more complex to enforce. This distinction impacts property valuations, development potential, and ongoing ownership costs. Understanding covenant types is essential for due diligence, advising clients on property purchases, and ensuring compliance with registered encumbrances. The concept connects to broader property law principles including the running of burdens and benefits with land, and the policy balance between protecting property rights and enabling land use flexibility.

Background Knowledge for Property Law

Covenants are legal obligations affecting land use that can bind current and future owners under the Torrens title system. They're typically created in subdivision developments or commercial arrangements. Restrictive covenants impose negative obligations (don't do something), while positive covenants impose affirmative duties (do something). Both types can be registered as encumbrances on the Certificate of Title. The Real Property Act in each state governs registration and enforceability. Positive covenants face greater enforceability challenges against successors due to the principle that the burden of positive obligations doesn't automatically run with land, though various statutory and contractual mechanisms can overcome this limitation.

Memory Technique

Think of restrictive covenants as STOP signs (they stop/prohibit actions) and positive covenants as GO signs (they require you to go and do something actively). Restrictive = Restrict = STOP doing something. Positive = Positive action = GO and do something.

When you see a covenant question, immediately ask: 'Is this telling someone to STOP doing something or GO and do something?' This instantly identifies whether it's restrictive (STOP) or positive (GO), helping you eliminate wrong answers quickly.

Exam Tip for Property Law

Look for action words in covenant descriptions. Words like 'prohibit', 'restrict', 'not permit' indicate restrictive covenants. Words like 'maintain', 'contribute', 'repair', 'provide' indicate positive covenants requiring active performance.

Real World Application in Property Law

In a residential subdivision, the developer registers covenants on all lots. A restrictive covenant prohibits building above two storeys (stops an action). A positive covenant requires all owners to contribute $500 annually for common area maintenance (requires active payment). When selling a property, the agent must disclose both types to buyers, explaining the height restriction limits development potential while the maintenance levy creates ongoing financial obligations. Both covenants will bind future purchasers as they're registered on title.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Law Questions

  • •Confusing covenant types with their enforceability - both can be registered
  • •Assuming time limits apply universally to all covenants
  • •Thinking covenant types are determined by land use rather than obligation nature

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

restrictive covenantpositive covenantTorrens titleencumbranceland obligations

More Property Law Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 520+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions