EstatePass
Property LawSale Of Land ActMEDIUM

A buyer discovers a material defect in a property after settlement. Under which circumstances would they most likely have a successful claim against the vendor?

Correct Answer

B) The vendor knew of the defect and deliberately concealed it from buyers.

Caveat emptor means a vendor generally has no duty to point out defects the buyer could discover. Deliberately concealing a known defect is different: it can amount to fraudulent misrepresentation or deceit, and a claim for damages or rescission can survive settlement. An agent who takes part in the concealment also risks liability for misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law and disciplinary action.

Answer Options
A
The defect was plainly visible when the buyer inspected the property before signing.
B
The vendor knew of the defect and deliberately concealed it from buyers.
C
The defect developed after settlement through ordinary wear and tear.
D
The buyer chose not to get a building inspection before exchanging contracts.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Active concealment of a known defect, such as hiding cracking behind new linings, is a form of misrepresentation. The buyer can sue for deceit or seek rescission even after settlement, because caveat emptor does not protect a vendor who deliberately misleads.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Deep Analysis of This Property Law Question

Background Knowledge for Property Law

Memory Technique

Exam Tip for Property Law

Real World Application in Property Law

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Property Law Questions

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

deliberate concealmentmaterial defectmisleading conductvendor disclosurepost-settlement remedies
Was this explanation helpful?

More Property Law Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions