EstatePass
Finance TaxationNegative GearingMEDIUM

A property investor owns a negatively geared property that generates $30,000 annual rental income and incurs $45,000 in deductible expenses. If their marginal tax rate is 37%, what is their annual tax saving from negative gearing?

Correct Answer

A) $5,550

The property loss is $15,000 ($45,000 expenses minus $30,000 income). At a 37% marginal tax rate, the tax saving is $15,000 × 37% = $5,550. This represents the reduction in tax payable due to the deductible property loss.

Answer Options
A
$5,550
B
$11,100
C
$15,000
D
$16,650

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option A correctly calculates the tax saving from negative gearing. The property generates a $15,000 loss ($45,000 expenses - $30,000 income). Under Australian taxation law, this deductible loss reduces taxable income. At a 37% marginal tax rate, the tax saving is $15,000 × 0.37 = $5,550. This represents the actual reduction in tax payable due to the negative gearing loss being offset against other income.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: $11,100

This incorrectly applies the 37% tax rate to the total expenses ($30,000 × 37% = $11,100) rather than to the actual loss. Tax benefits only apply to the net loss amount, not the gross expenses. The rental income reduces the deductible amount.

Option C: $15,000

This represents the gross loss amount ($15,000) without applying the marginal tax rate. The tax saving is not the full loss amount but only the percentage of the loss equal to the marginal tax rate.

Option D: $16,650

This incorrectly applies the 37% tax rate to the total expenses ($45,000 × 37% = $16,650). Tax deductions apply only to the net loss after subtracting rental income, not to gross expenses.

Deep Analysis of This Finance Taxation Question

This question tests understanding of negative gearing tax benefits under Australian taxation law. Negative gearing occurs when rental income is less than deductible property expenses, creating a tax-deductible loss. The property shows a $15,000 annual loss ($45,000 expenses minus $30,000 income). Under Australian tax law, this loss can be offset against other taxable income, reducing the investor's overall tax liability. The tax saving equals the loss multiplied by the marginal tax rate. This concept is fundamental to Australian property investment strategy, as negative gearing provides immediate tax relief while investors await capital growth. The calculation demonstrates how tax deductions work progressively - higher income earners with higher marginal rates receive greater tax benefits from the same property loss, making negative gearing particularly attractive to high-income investors.

Background Knowledge for Finance Taxation

Negative gearing in Australia allows property investors to claim tax deductions when rental expenses exceed rental income. The net loss can be offset against other taxable income, reducing overall tax liability. Key deductible expenses include interest on investment loans, property management fees, maintenance, insurance, and depreciation. The tax saving equals the net loss multiplied by the investor's marginal tax rate. This strategy is particularly beneficial for high-income earners due to progressive tax rates. Australian taxation law permits this immediate deduction, unlike some countries that require losses to be carried forward.

Memory Technique

Remember LOSS: Loss × Ordinary tax rate = Saving. Like a discount at a store - you only save a percentage of what you lose. If you lose $15,000 and your 'discount rate' (tax rate) is 37%, you save $5,550 (37% of your loss).

When you see negative gearing questions, immediately identify the LOSS (expenses minus income), then multiply by the tax rate percentage to find your Saving. Don't apply tax rates to gross figures - only to the net loss.

Exam Tip for Finance Taxation

Always calculate the net loss first (expenses minus income), then multiply by the marginal tax rate. Don't apply tax rates to gross expenses or income - only to the actual loss amount.

Real World Application in Finance Taxation

Sarah, a surgeon earning $200,000 annually, buys an investment property. The property generates $35,000 rental income but costs $50,000 in loan interest, rates, and maintenance. Her $15,000 loss reduces her taxable income from $200,000 to $185,000. At her 37% marginal rate, she saves $5,550 in tax, effectively reducing her property's annual cost from $15,000 to $9,450. This tax benefit helps offset the negative cash flow while she awaits capital growth.

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Finance Taxation Questions

  • •Applying tax rate to gross expenses instead of net loss
  • •Using the wrong marginal tax rate
  • •Forgetting to subtract rental income from expenses first

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

negative gearingmarginal tax ratedeductible expensesrental incometax saving

More Finance Taxation Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 520+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions