EstatePass
Contracts ConveyancingSettlement ProcessHARD

In a complex commercial property transaction using PEXA, the buyer's solicitor discovers a priority caveat lodged against the title 30 minutes before the scheduled settlement time. The caveat was not disclosed in pre-settlement searches conducted one week earlier. What is the most appropriate immediate action?

Correct Answer

B) Abort the PEXA settlement and investigate the caveat before proceeding

A priority caveat discovered immediately before settlement represents a significant title issue that could affect the buyer's ability to obtain clear title. The prudent course is to abort the PEXA settlement to investigate the caveat's validity and implications, as proceeding could expose the buyer to substantial legal and financial risks that cannot be adequately assessed in such a short timeframe.

Answer Options
A
Proceed with settlement and address the caveat post-settlement
B
Abort the PEXA settlement and investigate the caveat before proceeding
C
Contact the caveator directly to negotiate immediate withdrawal
D
Lodge a counter-caveat to protect the buyer's interests

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Conveyancing Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts Conveyancing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts Conveyancing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Conveyancing Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

caveatPEXAsettlementTorrens titledue diligence
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Conveyancing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 520+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions