EstatePass
Contracts ConveyancingContract BreachQLDHARD

A contract of sale in Queensland contains a clause stating 'time is of the essence' regarding the settlement date. The purchaser is ready to settle but the vendor cannot provide vacant possession until three days after the contractual settlement date due to tenant issues. What is the most likely legal consequence?

Correct Answer

B) The purchaser may terminate the contract and claim damages for the breach

When 'time is of the essence' clauses apply, strict adherence to settlement dates is required. The vendor's inability to provide vacant possession by the settlement date constitutes a fundamental breach, giving the purchaser the right to terminate the contract and potentially claim damages for losses incurred.

Answer Options
A
The contract ends automatically and the vendor must refund the deposit to the buyer
B
The purchaser may terminate the contract and claim damages for the breach
C
Settlement is extended by law until the vendor is able to give vacant possession
D
The purchaser must still settle but can charge the vendor daily default interest

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Contracts Conveyancing Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Contracts Conveyancing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Contracts Conveyancing

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Contracts Conveyancing Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

time is of the essencefundamental breachvacant possessioncontract terminationdamages
Was this explanation helpful?

More Contracts Conveyancing Questions

People Also Study

Practice More AU Questions

Access 1,100+ Australian real estate practice questions and ace your Certificate IV.

Browse All AU Questions