A vendor instructs their agent not to accept offers below $800,000. The agent receives an offer for $750,000. What should the agent do?
Correct Answer
B) Present the offer to the vendor despite their instructions
Agents must present all legitimate offers regardless of vendor instructions about minimum prices. The vendor's initial instruction doesn't override their right to be informed about all offers and circumstances may have changed since the instruction was given.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because agents have a fiduciary duty under Australian agency law to present all legitimate offers to their principal, regardless of previous instructions about minimum prices. This duty ensures vendors receive complete market information to make informed decisions. The vendor's circumstances or market conditions may have changed since the initial instruction, and they retain the right to consider all offers. Failing to present legitimate offers could constitute a breach of the agent's duty of care and potentially result in professional misconduct charges.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option C: Negotiate with the buyer to increase the offer to $800,000
Option C is incorrect because the agent lacks authority to negotiate on behalf of the buyer or attempt to modify their offer without the vendor's knowledge. The agent's role is to facilitate communication between parties, not to independently negotiate terms. Additionally, this approach denies the vendor the opportunity to consider the actual offer presented, which may be acceptable despite being below their initial expectations.
Option D: Accept the offer if they believe it's reasonable
Option D is wrong because agents cannot accept offers on behalf of vendors without explicit authority. Only the vendor (principal) has the legal capacity to accept contractual offers. An agent's personal opinion about the reasonableness of an offer is irrelevant to their legal obligations. Accepting an offer without authority would exceed the agent's scope of authority and could result in serious legal consequences.
Deep Analysis of This Agency Practice Question
This question tests understanding of an agent's fundamental duty to present all legitimate offers to their principal, regardless of prior instructions about minimum acceptable prices. Under Australian agency law and real estate legislation, agents have a fiduciary duty to act in their client's best interests, which includes keeping them fully informed about market activity. While vendors may give initial instructions about price expectations, circumstances can change rapidly in real estate markets. The vendor may have become more motivated to sell, market conditions may have shifted, or the offer might contain favorable terms beyond just price. By presenting all offers, agents ensure vendors can make informed decisions with complete information. This principle protects both the vendor's interests and the agent's professional obligations, preventing situations where agents make unauthorized decisions that could result in missed opportunities or legal liability.
Background Knowledge for Agency Practice
Under Australian agency law and state-based real estate legislation, agents owe fiduciary duties to their principals including loyalty, good faith, and full disclosure. The duty to present all legitimate offers stems from the broader obligation to act in the client's best interests and provide complete information for decision-making. This principle is reinforced by professional conduct standards administered by state regulatory bodies. Agents who fail to present offers may face disciplinary action, including license suspension. The concept of 'legitimate offers' excludes frivolous or clearly inappropriate proposals but includes all genuine purchase attempts, regardless of price.
Memory Technique
Remember PRESENT: 'Principal Receives Every Single Earnest Negotiable Tender.' Just like a gift must be presented to be received, every legitimate offer must be presented to the vendor, regardless of the agent's or vendor's initial preferences about price.
When you see questions about offer presentation, think 'PRESENT' - the agent must always present legitimate offers to the principal. If the question involves an agent making decisions about offers without consulting the vendor, the answer is likely wrong.
Exam Tip for Agency Practice
Look for questions where agents are making decisions instead of presenting information to vendors. The correct answer almost always involves presenting offers to the principal, not the agent making independent judgments about acceptability.
Real World Application in Agency Practice
A vendor lists their property for $900,000 and instructs their agent not to present offers below $850,000. After two months with no offers, the market softens and the vendor faces financial pressure. An offer comes in at $820,000 with favorable settlement terms. The agent must present this offer because the vendor's circumstances may have changed, and they need current market information to make an informed decision about their options.
Common Mistakes to Avoid on Agency Practice Questions
- •Thinking agents can reject offers based on vendor's initial price instructions
- •Believing agents have authority to accept offers they consider reasonable
- •Assuming agents should negotiate with buyers before consulting vendors
Related Topics & Key Terms
Key Terms:
More Agency Practice Questions
Under Victorian legislation, what is the maximum duration for an exclusive agency agreement for residential property sales?
What is the primary legal relationship between a real estate agent and their client when selling a property?
Which of the following is NOT a fiduciary duty owed by a real estate agent to their principal?
Under most Australian state legislation, what is the minimum period an agency agreement must remain in effect?
Sarah, a licensed real estate agent, discovers that a property she is marketing has structural issues that the vendor has not disclosed. What is her primary obligation?
- → In NSW, what happens to an agency agreement if the principal dies before the property is sold?
- → An agent receives two offers on a property simultaneously - one from their spouse and one from an unrelated party. Both offers are identical. What should the agent do?
- → A real estate agent fails to present an offer to their principal because they believe it is too low and will be rejected. This action represents a breach of which fundamental duty?
- → In Queensland, an agent enters into a dual agency arrangement representing both vendor and purchaser in the same transaction. Which statement is correct regarding disclosure requirements?
- → An agent discovers after settlement that they inadvertently failed to disclose a material fact that was known to them during the sales process. The purchaser suffers financial loss and seeks compensation. What is the most likely legal consequence for the agent?
- → What is the primary legal relationship between a real estate agent and their client when selling a property?
- → Which of the following is NOT a fiduciary duty owed by a real estate agent to their principal?
- → Under NSW legislation, what is the minimum cooling-off period for residential property purchases?
- → What must be included in a valid agency agreement under most Australian state legislation?
- → Sarah, a licensed real estate agent, wants to purchase a property that she has listed for sale. What is her primary legal obligation?
People Also Study
Property Law & Legislation
60 questions
Contracts & Conveyancing
60 questions
Property Marketing & Sales
50 questions
Property Management
50 questions
Previous Question
A real estate agent receives two offers on the same property within minutes of each other. What is their primary obligation under agency law?
Next Question
A vendor instructs their agent not to disclose a material fact about the property to potential buyers. How should the agent respond under Australian agency law?